The acting out, the make believe, that's good,
the "fake it till you make it" kind of deal,
is great adventures' only way forward,
but can turn bad, if it is not for real...
For one way tries to stimulate the best.
The other simulates, to minimize
the work, and expectations so a test,
might not show what is right before your eyes.
The little cross (or "t") makes all the diff-
rence, one way is committed to what's real -
will let it's "cover be blown", wants no whiff
of that hypocrisy that eats a meal
at the expense of others who come by.
It plays games gladly, but as good-sports do.
It keeps the lines quite clear, & doesn't try
to blurr distinctions, 'n'hide behind a few.
One uses acting's pow'r for real change,
and growth in things it couldn't do before;
the other method is a bit deranged,
and hopes for some confusion in the score.
It uses acting's pow'r to mean less change -
if surface change is made, and folk are tricked,
then energy's conserved, except the dang-
-er that (Yeshua warned of,) - makes folk sick;
with sickness that is worse than cancer's kind.
Those cells are fake - they look like body cells,
but will not follow orders, just keep blind-
ly doing their own thing, with powerful spells.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for adding to the conversation...